Sargent Law Offices

Alameda County Business, Estate Planning & Probate

Free Consultation 510.344.2599
  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Areas of Practice
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
  • Former Military Officer

    Hannah Sargent is a former officer, a two-time Iraq vet, and is certified with the VA.

    Meet Hannah Sargent
  • Testimonials

    See why our Castro Valley law firm has been trusted by so many.

    Read Client Reviews
  • Free Case Evaluation

    Talk with a lawyer to understand your options in a number of legal areas.

    Schedule a Free Consult
Blog 2015 July Gaining Increased Control over Your Marital Trust Property
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Gaining Increased Control over Your Marital Trust Property

Posted By Sargent Law Offices || 22-Jul-2015

Oftentimes married couples would like more control over how their trust property is distributed after their death. This may occur if a couple enters into a second or third marriage later in life, but has children from previous marriages. The trust maker may wish to guarantee that her current spouse may still use some of the trust assets after her death, while also leaving a significant amount to her children from a previous marriage.

A common example involves the use of the couple’s home. If the wife owns the home, she may still want her second husband to be able to live in the home after her death, but after he dies, wants the home to go to her children from her first marriage.

Achieving Your Goals through a Marital Property Control Trust

This can be accomplished through a marital property control trust. This kind of trust would name the spouse as the “life beneficiary” for the trust property, giving the surviving spouse a limited right to use the property during his lifetime only. The surviving spouse would not have the right to leave that property to anyone else and may only use the trust property as specified in the trust document. As a result, the children of the trust maker would be the final beneficiaries of the property and receive it upon the surviving spouse’s death.

Some important questions to think through when considering a marital property control trust include:

  • Who should be named as the trustee? The surviving spouse may not be the best person or the duty might best be shared amongst the surviving spouse and a child from a previous marriage.
  • What rights does the surviving spouse have regarding the trust property? If it’s a house, can the surviving spouse rent it out? If its investment assets and the surviving spouse gets interest only, can he also buy and sell the assets?
  • Who will manage the day-to-day maintenance of the trust property?
  • What regular reports or accounting must be given on the trust property to the life beneficiaries?
  • What happens if the surviving spouse abandons the property? What would constitute “abandonment” of such property?
A marital property control trust can be very effective if drafted properly, but it can also quickly become quite complicated. Thus it is critical that an estate planning attorney be consulted to create such a trust. Turn to Sargent Law Offices today! Our lead attorney, Hannah Sargent, offers dedicated representation in and throughout Alameda County. Call us today to get started!

Share Post

Areas of Practice

How Can We Help?

  • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Intellectual Property
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Probate

How Can We Help?

Send Message
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Sargent Law Offices

Call Now (510) 344-2599

Sargent Law Offices - Castro Valley Estate Planning Attorney
20880 Redwood Road
Castro Valley, CA 94546
Map & Directions [+]

Call Now (510) 344-2599
(510) 512-5400
Website: https://www.sargentlawoffices.com
© 2021 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.